1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/src/test/java/com/amazon/carbonado/qe/TestUnionQueryAnalyzer.java b/src/test/java/com/amazon/carbonado/qe/TestUnionQueryAnalyzer.java
index df2696d..7488c5b 100644
--- a/src/test/java/com/amazon/carbonado/qe/TestUnionQueryAnalyzer.java
+++ b/src/test/java/com/amazon/carbonado/qe/TestUnionQueryAnalyzer.java
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
 

     public void testSingleSubResult() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class, "shipmentID = ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

         UnionQueryAnalyzer.Result result = uqa.analyze(filter, null);

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
 

     public void testSingleSubResultUnspecifiedDirection() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class, "shipmentID > ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

         OrderingList<Shipment> orderings =

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
 

     public void testSimpleUnion() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class,

                                                    "shipmentID = ? | orderID = ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
  

     public void testSimpleUnion2() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class,

                                                    "shipmentID = ? | orderID > ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
 

     public void testSimpleUnion3() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class,

                                                    "shipmentID = ? | orderID > ? & orderID <= ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
 

     public void testSimpleUnionUnspecifiedDirection() throws Exception {

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor(Shipment.class,

                                                    "shipmentID > ? | orderID = ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
         // split this into a union. After futher analysis, it should decide

         // that this offers no benefit and will merge them back.

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor

             (Shipment.class,

              "shipmentID = ? & (shipmentID = ? | orderID = ?)");

@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
     public void testFullScan() throws Exception {

         // Because no indexes were selected, there's no union to perform.

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor

             (Shipment.class, "shipmentNotes = ? | shipperID = ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
         // Because not all sub-results of union use an index, just fallback to

         // doing a full scan.

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor

             (Shipment.class, "shipmentNotes = ? | orderID = ?");

         filter = filter.bind();

@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ public class TestUnionQueryAnalyzer extends TestCase {
         // Although not all sub-results use an index, one that does has a join

         // so it is exempt from folding into the full scan.

         UnionQueryAnalyzer uqa =

-            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.IxProvider.INSTANCE);

+            new UnionQueryAnalyzer(Shipment.class, TestIndexedQueryAnalyzer.RepoAccess.INSTANCE);

         Filter<Shipment> filter = Filter.filterFor

             (Shipment.class, "shipmentNotes = ? | orderID = ? & order.orderTotal > ?");

         filter = filter.bind();